It's been a week of change. Last day at the old job, first days at the new.
Things have been busy and I've been offline most of the time. Things should
start stabalizing soon...
— Michael A. Cleverly
Sunday, March 06,
2005
at 17:30
609 comments
| Printer friendly version
Catching up on some of my favorite blogs, Kevin Walzer has
a post, Free
and cracked [Macintosh] software that is well worth
reading.
— Michael A. Cleverly
Monday, March 07,
2005
at 21:43
587 comments
| Printer friendly version
I let my WSJ subscription lapse a
couple of years back after almost a decade. I'm reminded of the kind of
articles I miss when Small Biz
Mac reports on a
Walter S. Moosberg
article on switching from Windows to OS X.
— Michael A. Cleverly
Tuesday, March 08,
2005
at 20:23
599 comments
| Printer friendly version
Tomorrow I'll have my final paycheck from Deseret Book, including the pay
out for all my unused vacation & special sick leave. Though it'll be
taxed as though it were a bonus, I rarely used much time off during six
years, so I'm excpecting a tidy little sum.
One of the first things I have to do is buy a new
Apple laptop. My new job has provided
me with a Dell
laptop. The first night I brought it home, Meghan exclaimed with
disdain and disgust: "they make you use a Dell?!".
(I felt like such a proud father! ;-)
While admittedly the stability of Windows has improved in the last six or
seven years since I last had the misfortune of using it as my primary OS, but
I still have to reboot far too often and put up with other unexplained
annoyances. With a Macintosh computing (for me) is a relaxing pleasure.
The Aqua interface is beautiful. The
product (even down to the packaging) shows real craftsmanship and attention
to usability. And it's got the full power of *nix under the hood (yeah!).
Running Fisher Price Windows XP
I feel physical tension and stress. I need to get back to the
zen
of OS X ASAP.
Now that my own money is on the line, I'm somewhat torn between being
budget concious and getting a 14" iBook or splurging and getting a
15" (or 17"!) PowerBook.
Whichever I buy, I plan on purchasing it from
MacDocs, a local Salt Lake shop,
because of their
philosophy:
Why we do this is simple. At the core our group believes in the product. We feel the Macintosh platform is the pinnacle of personal computing that all other platforms aspire to be.
That really resonates with me.
— Michael A. Cleverly
Monday, March 14,
2005
at 20:36
584 comments
| Printer friendly version
I bought a new 15" PowerBook on Wednesday. I got a good deal on
a 1.33 GHz model, now that the 1.5 GHz are out. It's the same speed
I had before, which seemed adequate enough. Plus, I figured more RAM
would be more useful than an extra 0.167 GHz.
I'm busy compiling Fink
packages this evening.
— Michael A. Cleverly
Saturday, March 19,
2005
at 22:18
609 comments
| Printer friendly version
This
description of a dream house sounds like something my sister
Becca could have
dreamt up.
— Michael A. Cleverly
Saturday, March 19,
2005
at 22:22
601 comments
| Printer friendly version
I'm in Austin, TX this week for
Vignette training. I've been to
Houston (too humid) and San Antonio before (plus made connections at
Dallas/Ft. Worth), but this is my first visit to Austin. (Texas joins
South Dakota and Arizona as other states I could see myself living
in, were I to move.)
The hotel I'm staying at puports to have high
speed internet access, but it's certainly not in-room access. At least not
in the room I'm in—403. (Maybe that's because
the
403 HTTP response code means "Forbidden/Access Denied"?)
I didn't ask about it last night because I had
Angels &
Demons to finish reading (I picked it up in an airport bookshop
on the way down here). I enjoyed it even more than
The Da Vinci Code.
There is an Apple
Store here, just a couple minutes from where I'm staying. I'm
going to pay them a visit this evening! If anyone reading this along the
Wasatch Front needs me to pick them up anything, just leave a comment. I'm
here through Friday afternoon.
— Michael A. Cleverly
Wednesday, March 23,
2005
at 11:32
642 comments
| Printer friendly version
Much to my personal civic disappointment, I've never been called up
for jury duty. I get a little jealous when friends get to serve. With
my luck someday when I actually have a chance I'll probably be excused.
How does jury duty relate to possibly commiting the "perfect crime" in
Yellowstone National Park?
The sixth
ammendment to the
Constitution of the
United States reads (emphasis added):
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and
district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the
nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses
against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor,
and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
The emphasized portion is known as the vicinage clause.
(Websters defines vicinage means "the place or places adjoining or
near; neighborhood; vicinity; as, a jury must be of the vicinage.")
The Volokh Conspiracy had a post Saturday
about a fun, entertaining, clever, and short law review article
entitled The Perfect Crime. I agree that it is fun, entertaining,
clever, and short and suggest you take a few minutes to read it.
The gist for those who don't want to download
the PDF is that since the constitution requires an impartial jury be drawn
from the district
and state, and because all of Yellowstone National Park is in the
District of Wyoming, but since the park population within the Idaho-portion of
the park is zero, it would be impossible to constitutionally empanel a jury to
hear the case.
While there are hundreds of thousands of people who
live within the boundaries of the District of Wyoming, and there are millions
in Idaho, there isn't anybody presently who is in both groups, let alone
twelve.
For my programming oriented readers this means that:
SELECT citizen FROM idaho_residents
INTERSECT
SELECT citizen FROM district_of_wy;
wouldn't return any rows.
One potential solution is for the government to encourage people to move
into the Idaho portion of Yellowstone National Park. There are apparently
already a few hundred people who actually live within the Montana portion of
Yellowstone...
If I could telecommute and live within Yellowstone, I'd have to
add Idaho to my list of states I'd enjoy living in. Plus, it would
dramatically increase my chances of eventually serving on a jury. :-)
— Michael A. Cleverly
Monday, March 28,
2005
at 18:55
818 comments
| Printer friendly version
The cafeteria at work has a fairly decent salad bar. The cost is
$0.28 per ounce. When you pay for it, they weigh it on a scale that
registers the weight in pounds, to three decimal points.
So what's the point? Well, I like salads. And, more importantly,
if you can guess the price of your salad—to the penny—then it's
free. You are allowed to see the weight (in pounds) and know the price
(per ounce) and are even given a moment to do some mental calculations
(though I suspect calculators would be prohibited).
I suspect what makes it difficult for most people, even knowing the
price and the weight, is remembering that there are sixteen ounces in
a pound, and calculating accordingly. It would be a lot simpler if
the pricing and the scale were in metric units.
But we can probably compensate just by calculating what 1/10th of a
pound of salad costs, and practicing multiplying by that unit.
$0.28 per oz, with 16 ozs. per lb. means a salad costs
$0.28 x 16 = $4.48. Each tenth of a pound
costs $0.448 (hundredth is $0.0448 and thousandeth is $0.00448).
Weight |
|
Price |
Weight |
|
Price |
0.10 lbs. | = | $0.448 |
0.55 lbs. | = | $2.464 |
0.15 lbs. | = | $0.672 |
0.60 lbs. | = | $2.688 |
0.20 lbs. | = | $0.896 |
0.65 lbs. | = | $2.912 |
0.25 lbs. | = | $1.120 |
0.70 lbs. | = | $3.136 |
0.30 lbs. | = | $1.344 |
0.75 lbs. | = | $3.360 |
0.35 lbs. | = | $1.568 |
0.80 lbs. | = | $3.584 |
0.40 lbs. | = | $1.792 |
0.85 lbs. | = | $3.808 |
0.45 lbs. | = | $2.016 |
0.90 lbs. | = | $4.032 |
0.50 lbs. | = | $2.240 |
0.95 lbs. | = | $4.256 |
I've personally only ever seen their scale register a zero or a five
in the third decimal place. If it's a zero, nothing needs to be added
to the overall price. If it's a five, then $0.022 needs to be added
to the total.
I've included beyond two decimal places on the dollar amounts above because
if you round prematurely you might end up being off by a penny—and
if that happens, the lunch won't be free...
— Michael A. Cleverly
Tuesday, March 29,
2005
at 23:29
597 comments
| Printer friendly version